Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560322 Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> 2010-01-31 12:04:08 EST --- * Hardcoded /usr/lib in -config scripts in x86_64 package. * /usr/include/urg/findFiles.h depends on boost-devel, but this header is optional (currently) and hence the dependency on boost-devel is optional. So, this acceptable. * Only the README mentions the LGPL licensing with a single word. Less than ideal (as preferably, the source files also refer to the licensing), but acceptable. $ rpmlint urg-*.x86_64.rpm urg.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Hokuyo -> Hokum, Hokusai, Hokey urg.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C URG urg.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Hokuyo -> Hokum, Hokusai, Hokey urg-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. * src.rpm crashes rpmlint from updates-testing ;) * "spectool -g urg-0.8.7-1.fc12.src/urg.spec" only retrieves a HTML page, not the tarball. * Please point out the compiler warnings to upstream. Especially the format string warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
