Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560240 --- Comment #10 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-02-03 03:27:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Should all warnings in libxls be fixed before making libxls > > available in fedora? > > Well, you've already shown that you don't like to fix any of these. > > It's a tiny package with only few compiler warnings. Fixing real bugs reduces > the risk that some of these issues create breakage, which leads to bug > reports. Sorry for my impatienceļ¼ since libxls are only required by qtiplot, I'll test if libxls 0.3.0 can work with qtiplot. I don't know which version of libxls were used by qtiplot developer, libxls 0.3.0 changes API a lot. If libxls 0.3.0 can work with qtiplot, I'll fix those compile warnings. Otherwise, I'll switch to packaging libxls 0.2.0 which has few compile waring. It doesn't deserve to fix a library that are not used by any program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
