Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #23 from Klaus Grue <[email protected]> 2010-02-17 03:15:12 EST --- > Well, explicitly calling $ ulimit -s unlimited makes build > proceed a bit longer: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1992518 Thanks. I can include a 'ulimit -s unlimited' in the makefile. That may fail if stack is limited because as far as I know, bash can only reduce stack size. But at least a build error from ulimit will tell what was wrong. > This time observes a different build failure. Would you look > into this? Yes. I will produce a new package which BuildRequires vim-common to get xxd (VIM is a rather large system to BuildRequire just to get the small xxd program, but VIM seems to be the place to get xxd. This is in line with Cygwin build requirements, by the way). > By the way it seems "Requires: texlive-latex, dvipdfm" should be > "BuildRequires". You are right. texlive-latex and dvipdfm are not *needed*, but BuildRequiring them would avoid lots of warnings. Thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
