Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466 --- Comment #3 from Paul Flo Williams <[email protected]> 2010-02-19 11:33:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > I forgot to question this one. OFL v1.1 isn't on the list of valid licences, > so > I omitted the version when I guess I should have asked upstream about this. >From the Fedora Licensing page, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main, it appears that OFL v1.1 has the short name "OFL", so the spec is correct. If you're asking about the "OFL and GPL" versus "OFL or GPL", then Packaging:LicensingGuidelines says that this one is "or", as the font is dual licensed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
