Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566757

--- Comment #3 from Johannes Russek <[email protected]> 
2010-02-19 11:48:59 EST ---
well, they both use /etc/ipsec.d, /etc/ipsec.conf and /etc/ipsec.secrets, both
provide /usr/sbin/ipsec and both provide a daemon named pluto that binds to the
same port to name a few.

it would basically mean renaming almost everything to make it non-conflicting
and tbh i don't much see the point of having both openswan and strongswan on
the same machine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to