Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566962 --- Comment #10 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-02-23 04:03:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > > rpmbuild --rebuild > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/polipo-1.0.4.1-2.fc12.src.rpm > > > > Please test the initscript and RPM post scripts to see if them work fine on > > your PC. > The reviewer should test the software, not only the build and installation > process to verify the software works correct (or at least as designed). > > Did you inform upstream? There seem to exist more than one fedora-package for > polipo, e.g. http://devil.homelinux.org/Tor_related/polipo/ The software is only one file, so the verification of polipo itself is easy to do. Upstream will be informed until polipo is pushed to the repo of fedora. The polipo rpms provided by some third repos didn't meet fedora packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
