Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575504 Alex Orlandi <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Alex Orlandi <[email protected]> 2010-03-21 06:48:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Informal review > SRPM URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/metagoofil-1.4a-1.fc12.src.rpm2 - there's a typo in the url of the src.rpm (trailing "2") > [...] > > Output from the rpmlint : > $rpmlint /home/rebus/rpmbuild/SRPMS/metagoofil-1.4a-1.fc12.src.rpm > /home/rebus/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/metagoofil-1.4a-1.fc12.noarch.rpm > metagoofil.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdf -> pd, pf, pd f > [...] > metagoofil.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ods -> dos, ids, odd > - list of supported document types in the description - use CAPITALS for file extensions (i.e.: use PDF instead of pdf) > metagoofil.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libextractor > - explicit dependency is needed because it is executed from the perl script > and is not detected automatically - In general rpmlint suggests that "You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags." Anyway in this case it is quite probable that rpm can't find the dependency, so should be ok. > metagoofil.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdf -> pd, pf, pd f > [...] > metagoofil.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ods -> dos, ids, > odd > - list of supported document types in the description - same of above (capitalize) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
