https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817271
--- Comment #7 from Richard Shaw <[email protected]> --- Ok, licenses is one of my weak points and I'm not sure you have all the bases covered but I could definitely be wrong :) Licenses detected in source: $ licensecheck -r . | awk -F ": " '{ print $2 }' | sort | uniq -c 1 AGPL 22 AGPL (v2.1 or later) LGPL (v2.1 or later) 1276 AGPL (v3 or later) 9 AGPL (v3 or later) GENERATED FILE 2 AGPL (v3 or later) LGPL (v3 or later) 5 BSD (2 clause) 6 BSD (3 clause) 7 BSD (4 clause) 43 GPL 2 GPL GENERATED FILE 40 GPL (v2 or later) 41 GPL (v3 or later) 1 LGPL 1 *No copyright* AGPL (v3 or later) 43 *No copyright* GENERATED FILE 161 *No copyright* UNKNOWN 4 UNKNOWN Is just using "AGPLv3+" good enough to cover all of the AGPLs listed? Same for GPL. Also, BSD (4 clause) should be referenced as "BSD with advertising"... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
