Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575541 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts <[email protected]> 2010-03-30 19:09:19 EDT --- So at this point I'm failing to understand any of the objections here. I talked to one of the Fedora X maintainer who has no issue with this package or the naming, it's the same program which in ancient times was packaged with the same executable name and there's no conflict with anything else in the distribution. If R P Herrold has any relevant objection, I'm sure everyone will be happy to look into it, but I can see no reason why this package shouldn't go in as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
