https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749291
--- Comment #12 from Ricardo Rocha <[email protected]> --- Hi. Thanks for looking at this. See inline. (In reply to comment #10) > Conform to the requester wish, I take care of this. > > > First comments : > > - build failure on f16/el/e6 ( I have not tested the other ) : > ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4187213 > -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4187245 Forgot to say it, but for the moment it's aimed only at rawhide - that's where xrootd >= 3.2 is available for now, which we depend on. > -> BuildRequires > > - %{isa} macro is not required on BuildRequires > > - BuildRequires: xrootd-libs is implicite in xrootd-devel > > - GPL 3 -> No license file or no license in headers. > > - shadowutil dependency -> not needed if no user/group modifications > > - It is a good pratice to use %macro or $macro but not both for lisibility All fixed. I've updated the spec to build the new upstream release 3.1.0. http://rocha.web.cern.ch/rocha/fedora/dpm-xrootd.spec http://rocha.web.cern.ch/rocha/fedora/dpm-xrootd-3.1.0-1.src.rpm Koji build (rawhide): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4196700 Thanks again, Ricardo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
