https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836362

Matt Spaulding <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #1 from Matt Spaulding <[email protected]> ---
This is an unofficial practice review.

Rpmlint:

- Found "wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding" warnings
- Found "unexpanded-macro" warnings
- Found one "file-not-utf8" warning

Considering these ignorable based on:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721057
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249

Package Review:

- package meets package naming guidelines
- package meets Ruby guidelines
- base package name matches spec name
- legible and in American English
- license MIT is okay
- license file included in %doc section
- MD5 sum on tarball matches that of the upstream tarball
- no missing BuildRequires
- the "ruby" and "ruby(abi)" BuildRequires are not necessary
- the "ruby" Requires is not necessary
- no locales included
- not a relocatable package
- owns all directories it creates
- no duplicate files in %files section and all file names are valid utf-8
- file timestamps are okay, using "cp -a"
- consistent macro use
- includes -docs subpackage for documentation
- no files in %doc section are executable
- no bundled system libraries
- no development files
- no static libraries
- no need for .desktop file
- builds on x86 successfully in mock
- running example irc bot from examples directory worked
- no man pages, though it has ruby documentation files

Fixes:

- remove "ruby" and "ruby(abi)" BuildRequires
- remove "ruby" Requires

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to