https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832816
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <[email protected]> --- what's means imho? > a) The not existence of src and demo package is inttional? (means *1) - imho > it is more then worthy yes b) contrib directory is not worthy to be packed? no unavailable deps package org.jboss.system c) test can not be run during build? > d) /./usr/share/java/MckoiSQLDB.jar is symlink to mckoi.jar. In that case I > would recommand full version in mockoi-{version}.{release}.jar filename not can not do. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Filenames > e) in javadoc package ther is "bug" I do not understand - > /./usr/share/javadoc/mckoi/ contains javadoc and > /./usr/share/doc/mckoi-javadoc-1.0.4/ contains licence. (also > /./usr/share/doc/mckoi-1.0.4/ contains licence and readme for main package) imho /./usr/share/javadoc/mckoi/ should be symlink to /./usr/share/javadoc/mckoi-1.x.y/ which will then contains real javbadoc see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation > f) there is directory doc in BUILD. It contains interesting information. IMHO > they shoud go out in /./usr/share/doc/mckoi-1.0.4/ too (or whereevere you > decide) yes if only mckoi is packaged as as db > g) Isnt worthy some kinf of shell launcher to jar so anybody can connect > easily to db? (but here I have lack of mckoi db knowledge) mckoi is packaged as library and not as db, for now i haven't interest to add a launcher script -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
