https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836749
--- Comment #4 from Tim Sally <[email protected]> --- David, Thanks a lot for the informal review. In regards to the license, the project is GPL3. Please see the below personal communication with the author: -- From [email protected] Sun Jul 1 02:53:03 2012 Return-Path: <[email protected]> X-Original-To: [email protected] Delivered-To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:52:21 +0200 From: Agner Fog <[email protected]> Organization: [email protected] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Sally <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Which version of GPL for objconv? References: <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Status: RO Content-Length: 193 Lines: 12 version 3.0 On 30-06-2012 21:23, Tim Sally wrote: > Hi Anger, > > > > Thank you very much for writing objconv! I know it is GPL licensed, but > > I am wondering which version? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tim > > -- As to the other issues, I will generate a new spec addressing them tonight! Thanks again for the review, Tim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
