https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #56 from Michael Scherer <[email protected]> --- If the pkgconfig is used in development context ( compiling, etc ), then splitting files in a -devel rpm is IMHO the sane thing to do. If a normal usage do not need aclocal or pkgconfig file, then they should be in a separate rpm ( especially if this permit to avoid pulling aclocal and pkgconfig ). But that's not a big deal, no one complained about it for gnome ( but i guess the gnome package predate the policy by a few years ) And why add a subpackage for stylsheets ? ( "gnome does this way" is not a reason, that's just cargo cult programming, and while there is surely a good reason, I think it should be know and see if this is still valid ) There is also some notes from comment 11, like %clean and %defattr no longer needed. And since we are in a case of multiple licensing, there should be a comment explaining what is gpl and what is lgpl : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios ( I wonder why there is lgpl in fact, but too late to check for me, sorry ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
