https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
--- Comment #28 from pcpa <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #26) > I have some concerns. > > First, there's a mix of various versions of LPGL and GPL, among others. > These are not all necessarily compatible. See: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses > > and > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix > > There's the Doom3 md5 issue. > > By my reading, you can't include mt19937ar.c. I think you mean Random.cpp, there is some license analysis at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/megaglest/+copyright > Additionally, there are lots of files with no license information. In the > presence of so many licenses, what applies to what? > > I'm flagging FE-LEGAL for additional review. > > Any of these is enough to block the package if now resolved completely. > > Technical guidelines are very important, but legal ones are even more so, > and it's important to be as thourough as possible. Flagging FE-LEGAL will > get someone with more expertise with licensing to have a look, and is always > educational. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
