https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844170
--- Comment #2 from Jørn Lomax <[email protected]> --- Two of the issues are EPEL related (not applicable here), one is not applicable and the licencing issue is a false positive. Licence file is present and has appropriate short name in spec file. Dangling symlinks can be ignored You don't need a licence line in the single package since it's the same as the main package. You can also explain a little more explanation on how to obtain the source[1] Fix the above and i will happily approve the package [1]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
