https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740
Karel Volný <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://qmmp.ylsoftware.com/ | |plugins_en.php --- Comment #1 from Karel Volný <[email protected]> --- [kvolny@kvolny SPECS]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [kvolny@kvolny SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack-0.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [kvolny@kvolny x86_64]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm qmmp-plugin-pack-debuginfo-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm qmmp-plugin-pack.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/qmmp/Input/libffap.so The binary declares the stack as executable. Executable stack is usually an error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar constructs which uses code on the stack. One common source for needlessly executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't define a proper .note.GNU-stack section. qmmp-plugin-pack.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/qmmp-plugin-pack-0.6.1/COPYING The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. these are upstream issues - I've sent an email to Ilja about these (the upstream bugtracker requires Google account, thanks, no) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
