Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 Naoki IIMURA <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #20 from Naoki IIMURA <[email protected]> 2010-04-06 10:26:57 EDT --- I'm sorry that I don't have enough time to check your new package now. I'm going to look into it this weekend. I've downloaded the new SRPM and SPEC files and found that the SPEC file and tnef.spec included in the SRPM file are different. Here's diff: --- SPECS/tnef.spec 2010-03-20 08:27:32.000000000 +0900 +++ ../SPECS/tnef.spec 2010-03-20 09:51:26.000000000 +0900 @@ -14,18 +14,12 @@ Source2: tnef-extract.desktop Source3: tnefextract.desktop Source4: tnef.sh -#Patch0: debug.diff -#Patch1: tnef.spec -#Patch2: tnef-util_utf8.diff BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils BuildRequires: kde-filesystem Requires: kde-filesystem -# tnef tests fail on ppcX during build on koji. Awaiting upstream response. -#E#xcludeArch: ppc ppc64 - %description TNEF provides a way to unpack those pesky Microsoft MS-TNEF MIME attachments. @@ -37,9 +31,6 @@ %prep %setup -q -#%#patch0 -p1 -#%#patch1 -p1 -#%#patch2 -p1 %build @@ -85,10 +76,7 @@ %check -# large file test is known to fail on ppcX arch, so test on x86 -#%ifarch %{ix86} make check DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT -#%endif %files Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
