https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844164
--- Comment #16 from leigh scott <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #15) > I guess, this licensing thing will be ok. It's just the header file which is > apparently copied from OpenBSD and BSD licensed only. > > Another issue: > [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if > present. > Note: Unversioned so-files in non-devel package (fix or explain):mate- > vfs-smb-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- > vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 > /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libbzip2.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : > /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libcomputer.so mate- > vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libdns- > sd.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- > vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 > /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libftp.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : > /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libgzip.so mate- > vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so > mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- > vfs-2.0/modules/libnetwork.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : > /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libnntp.so mate- > vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libsftp.so > mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- > vfs-2.0/modules/libtar.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 > /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libvfs-test.so These aren't -devel files and belong in the main package or a seperate -libs package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
