https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> --- > - blocker: > mirall.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libmirallsync.so libmirallsync.so > The soname of the library is neither of the form lib<libname>.so.<major> or > lib<libname>-<major>.so. > mirall.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libowncloudsync.so > libowncloudsync.so > The soname of the library is neither of the form lib<libname>.so.<major> or > lib<libname>-<major>.so. > > ->I suppose these are not dev libs, so they must be versioned Says what guideline? Lack of library versioning is an upstream issue. I am not aware of any Fedora guideline requiring shared libraries to be versioned, and in fact I've been told multiple times that Fedora does NOT recommend inventing our own library versioning because the versioned sonames we come up with might conflict with later upstream ones. It IS recommended that shared libraries be versioned, but it must be done by upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
