https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819338

Yanko Kaneti <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|[email protected]    |[email protected]
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Yanko Kaneti <[email protected]> ---
There might be an argument that setuid programs need special FESCO/security
consideration before being accepted in the collection, but I think it should
apply only to packages that are installed by default in some of the official
spins.


I am approving the package given that:
- You'll fix the License: tag  which currently says LGPL2v+, the source is
GPLv2+
- You'll add a changelog
- You'll fix the Source: line   - s/2012.1/2012.2/
- You'll consider removing the rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT parts which are not
needed in fedora or el6

Otherwise the source matches, the package builds in mock and seems to work,
doesn't conflict with anything existing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to