https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847712

Rex Dieter <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter <[email protected]> ---
1.  So, looking at the main package, there's little risk of multilib conflicts
(no binaries in particular), so I'm tempted to suggest dropping the -libs
subpkg, and just fold all it's content (and scriptlets) into the main pkg
(that's how gnome-menus is packaged, fwiw).

2.  SHOULD move
NOCONFIGURE=1 ./autogen.sh
to %prep section

3.  SHOULD: noticed /usr/share/mate dir is unowned, will leave to you to 
decide where in  the mate stack would best own this.  checking /usr/share/gnome
$ rpm -q -f /usr/share/gnome
filesystem-3-2.fc17.x86_64
not helpful here. :(

4. SHOULD investigate if we need
Requires: redhat-menus
here somewhere.  (ie, test running this  and mate without redhat-menus
installed, to see if there's any regressions or oddities)

otherwise,

naming: ok

macros:  ok

scriptlets: ok

sources: ok

$ md5sum *.xz
540af0f76e2a28821cf4d32832c784d2  mate-menus-1.4.0.tar.xz

licensing: ok


items 1-4 aren't strictly blockers, but please do comment on or address them
prior to doing any builds.


APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to