https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244
--- Comment #14 from pcpa <[email protected]> --- I think surf-geometry should be good enough. About patching, it should require significant patching to the package itself because surf is hardcoded everywhere in build environment, and almost all, if not all source files have this before the standard GPL text: * surf - visualizing algebraic curves and algebraic surfaces * Copyright (C) 1996-1997 Friedrich-Alexander-Universitaet * Erlangen-Nuernberg * 1997-2000 Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz * Authors: Stephan Endrass, Hans Huelf, Ruediger Oertel, * Kai Schneider, Ralf Schmitt, Johannes Beigel [...] ./Makefile.am:bin_PROGRAMS = surf ./Makefile.am:EXTRA_DIST = background.pic Makefile.global aclocal.m4 surf.1 sur.xpm ./Makefile.am:man_MANS = surf.1 ./Makefile.am:pkgdata_DATA = surf.xpm ./Makefile.am:surf: $(LOCAL_OBJECTS) $(GTKGUI_OBJ) ./Makefile.am: $(CXX) $(LOCAL_OBJECTS) $(GTKGUI_OBJ) -o surf $(LDFLAGS) -lXmu -lXext -lXt @X_PRE_LIBS@ @X_LIBS@ -lX11 @X_EXTRA_LIBS@ $(LIBS) -lfl @GTK_LIBS@ -lcups [...] ./gtkgui/showAbout.cc: pixmap = gdk_pixmap_create_from_xpm (window->window, &mask, &style->bg[GTK_STATE_NORMAL], DATADIR "/surf/surf.xpm"); [...] I would vote for renaming to surf-geometry, but not patching the package itself neither Singular, that is, keep the Conflicts with the current surf package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
