https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851279
--- Comment #13 from Michael Scherer <[email protected]> --- > What's the suggestion here? I used that so that specifying relative paths > for > modules would work. I'm open to other ideas here. I do not have any cleaner suggestion, but I wonder how this would work on a server non dedicated to eucalyptus. For example, I am not sure the default logs file would not end in /var/log/httpd due to link in /etc/httpd, this kind of thing. But if your test didn't show a issue, there is then likely no issue. And the only thing to do would be to duplicate the tree of /etc/httpd, that's not a good idea IMHO. For a minimal set of modules, I guess removing them one by one could be easy to do once the rpm is in, so that's not urgent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
