https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858239
Mario Blättermann <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] | |m Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] | |m Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann <[email protected]> --- $ rpmlint -i -v * spec2scl.src: I: checking spec2scl.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) specfiles -> spec files, spec-files, specifiable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. spec2scl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US specfiles -> spec files, spec-files, specifiable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. spec2scl.src: I: checking-url https://bitbucket.org/bkabrda/spec2scl/ (timeout 10 seconds) spec2scl.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/s/spec2scl/spec2scl-0.3.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) spec2scl.noarch: I: checking spec2scl.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) specfiles -> spec files, spec-files, specifiable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. spec2scl.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US specfiles -> spec files, spec-files, specifiable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. spec2scl.noarch: I: checking-url https://bitbucket.org/bkabrda/spec2scl/ (timeout 10 seconds) spec2scl.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/spec2scl/settings.py spec2scl.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spec2scl Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. spec2scl.spec: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/s/spec2scl/spec2scl-0.3.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. The spelling errors and the missing manpage could be ignored, the latter one could be worth a hint to the upstream developer, if a manpage would make sense. The file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/spec2scl/settings.py is empty, although settings.pyo seems to contain some data. My knowledge about Python bytecode is poor, could you explain that please? If the rpmlint message is false positive, your package is ready for a full review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
