https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865976
--- Comment #3 from Alex G. <[email protected]> --- Regarding: Licenses found: "BSD (2 clause)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)" I have spoken with upstream, and they are aware some files are GPLv2+. However, the library as a whole is GPLV3+, and the headers installed by the -devel package are all GPLv3+. As a whole, the package is GPLv3+, and I think it doesn't make sense to specify both "GPLv3+ and GPLV2+". The same argument applies for the BSD files. I don't have a problem specifying all the licenses, although what is shipped ends up being GPLv3+. What is your take? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
