https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560
Moses Mendoza <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #32 from Moses Mendoza <[email protected]> --- Hi all, I thought I might and try help out on this one.. I updated the spec with what I could gather were the most recent requested changes, which were to use %{ruby_sitearch} for arch specific files for EPEL and Fedora < 17, remove the symlinking, and to set %gem_dir via %(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem::dir' 2>/dev/null). I also updated for upstream 2.1.4. Regarding the license difficulty, I contacted the upstream maintainer, and he now is considering a change to split out the license into a separate license file, and add an explicit "OR the Public Domain license". I'll update when I hear more, he said he's get back to me soon. One thing I wasn't certain of, given how the .so files are moved based on the target, is how best to compose the *.so's in the %files section. Currently I set it up in a nested conditional, but I'm not sure that's good style, so feedback much appreciated. srpm: https://s3.amazonaws.com/rubygemshadow/rubygem-ruby-shadow-2.1.4-1.fc16.src.rpm spec: https://s3.amazonaws.com/rubygemshadow/rubygem-ruby-shadow.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
