Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878245
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #6) > It is not. GPLv2 says, it's a "should": > > "You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software ..." > > That said, not shipping the GPL is pretty common in perl-dists, because > perl-dist authors often take knowing the GPL for granted. It's nothing I > would bother upstreams with, but this is just my personal preference. Thanks for sorting that out. > More important than this, is this: > .. > =head1 LEGACY INTERFACE > > B<Note:> this legacy interface is now deprecated, and will be dropped > in a future release. Please let me (Neil) know if you're using this > interface, and I'll do something to continue supporting you. > ... > > I.e. if there shouldn't be any other _actively maintained_ package (not one > from a computer museum), I'd recommend Fedora not to ship this perl-dist. Well, I packaged this as a dependency of Slic3r. And I really want that in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
