Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875450
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #7 from Axel Thimm <[email protected]> --- Hi all, I'm sponsoring Andreas, do I need to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker dependency? I guess I should, but it's not mentioned on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor, so I better ask. :) I can't really review the package, though, as I have no access to MS VPN infrastructure. Just a quick note on the versioned/unversioned library discussion: The idea behind the guideline is to keep the runtime dependencies in the non-devel package and move the devel ones to there. Usually this means package the versioned one(s) including the real lib and versioned symlinks to main or libs packages and keep the unversioned symlink to the devel package. From the discussion it looks like in this case the library is just dumped into an unversioned file, so it is OK to keep it in the main package. The guidelines kindly ask for the packager to also kindly ask of upstream to start versioning their libs in the next release. :) Welcome to Fedora, Andreas!!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xnVj0YTH8a&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
