Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724
--- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't it be named "nodejs-tap", even if there is a binary there ( since > the binary is mainly to support tap ) ? I guess that does make sense. I'll rename it. > and should the bootstrap stuff be also planned for porting to ARM ( or > anything else, but ARM is likely to appear sooner this year ) > > IE, once we start to use tap in module, and module need tap, there is a > circular dep that would cause issue later for arm. Should it be planned now > or not ? Well, I can build these packages myself in the ARM Koji to ensure at least that's not a problem. ;-) I'll make sure to conditonalize %check so other/future secondary arches can easily bootstrap as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nfBvUs354Y&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
