Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883472
--- Comment #10 from Radek Pazdera <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #9) > I'd say that having lnst package with the files from common and proper > documentation saying what's needed would suffice here. The problem with > practically useless package will always be there, you just transferred it to > the subpackage :) > Does that make sense? You're right, you would still be able to install just lnst-common alone. I just thought marking it in some way would somehow force people to actually look into the documentation and read what they should install :). Would it be acceptable to use the base package, but rename it to something like lnst-libs or lnst-common? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WM7D6GcKb9&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
