Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Eduardo Echeverria <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria <[email protected]> --- Hi Jeremy, I recently read your self introduction on the list, and I also want to give a warmly welcome to fedora, and give my comments ;) Recently by the arrival of nodejs to Fedora, has revived the need for an official guideline for the treatment of javascript libraries. See: [1] and [2] At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is exempted from the exposed in [3], but this will likely change in the future.(Near future, IMO) You have a directory called thirdparthy, and this files come from these projects,[4],[5] as well you indicate on the top of these files. From my perspective I see benefits to fedora,packaging these dependencies also, I would like to know your opinion on this. [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-January/008860.html [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:JavaScript_libraries_packaging_guideline_draft [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries [4] http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~tjw/jsbn/ [5] http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5 Best Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LG4mG1QIrX&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
