Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874980
--- Comment #16 from Alec Leamas <[email protected]> --- Hi! Nice to hear from you, but I guessed it was the new year. Welcome back! License: If you insist on multiple licenses, you must provide a license break-down (links in comment #12). I'm not convinced this is necessary though. rpaths: have you really got rid of those and checked with rpmlint? The macros in %check also looks *very* strange, what's going on here? Static lib: Isn't it the buildflag STATICBUILD which enables this? Can't you just disable that instead of building and removing the .a lib? Just a guess from my side. Please check the provides (build binary rpms and run rpm -q --provide -p <your binary package> and verify that all looks sound. Also verify that you can install the package, since this often becomes problematic when filtering) Have you checked the build log and verified that %optflags is used? BuildArch: noarch is still missing for the docs package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1jCjT6f2Sx&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
