Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912023
--- Comment #3 from Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #1) > I wonder would it make sense to have python-olso as the package, and as an > installable meta-package that would depend on the python-oslo-config etc. > subpackages? Do you mean include all upstream oslo-* libraries in a single RPM ? Or add a new, separate metapackage which depends on all separately packaged oslo-* libraries If the former, the policy is basically one upstream tarball to one downstream package. If the latter, what would use/depend on this metapackage? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3zEeG1r18t&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
