Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914996

Pavel Raiskup <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #6 from Pavel Raiskup <[email protected]> ---
Hi Stephenm, here is my first comment iteration :)

=======

1. bad spec naming?

> Upstream have already updated to resolve this so I've updated the SPEC and
> SRPM to pick this up. I also realized that there is .pod file provided which
> can be used to generate the man page so that is now also included.
>
> Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~sgordon/gitstats-0.2.spec
> SRPM URL: 
> http://fedorapeople.org/~sgordon/gitstats-0.2-20130224git0843039.fc18.src.rpm

Why do you now call the spec file gitstats-0.2.spec and not gitstats.spec? 
Your
first specfile was called gitstats.spec..

2. unnecessary %attr() macros

> $ cat *.spec
> [...]
> %files
> %attr(755, root, root) %{_bindir}/%{name}
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ none of these should be needed

3. Missing release number

> Release:    %{checkout}%{?dist}

I think that even the first release number should be specified.  Partly because
I (as a reviewer) can see, where it will be finally placed and because of this
also:

  $ rpmdev-vercmp gitstats-0.2-20130224git0843039
gitstats-0.2-1.20130224git0843039
  gitstats-0.2-20130224git0843039 > gitstats-0.2-1.20130224git0843039

4. (nit: I would create one-newline separator between changelog entries)

5. Gzip inside BuildRequires is redundant .. it must be installed on minimum
   build system.

Pavel

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=L8GL0SGVx7&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to