Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Karel Volný <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Karel Volný <[email protected]> --- a few complaints from the fedora-review tool: - install fails because of dependency on gstreamer-plugins-ugly, this belongs to the rpmfusion part - gtk-update-icon-cache and update-desktop-database not called in post scripts in addition, it reports more rpmlint problems not discussed above - strange permissions: xpra.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/wait_for_x_server.so 0775L xpra.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/xor/cyxor.so 0775L xpra.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/stats/cymaths.so 0775L xpra.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/rencode/_rencode.so 0775L python-wimpiggy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wimpiggy/lowlevel/bindings.so 0775L python-wimpiggy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wimpiggy/gdk/gdk_atoms.so 0775L I believe these should be 755 also the list corresponds to the list of unversioned libraries: xpra: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/rencode/_rencode.so xpra: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/stats/cymaths.so xpra: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/wait_for_x_server.so xpra: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/xor/cyxor.so python-wimpiggy: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wimpiggy/gdk/gdk_atoms.so python-wimpiggy: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wimpiggy/lowlevel/bindings.so I believe this fits under the exception mentioned in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages "As an additional complication, some software generates unversioned shared objects which are not intended to be used as system libraries. These files are usually plugins or modular functionality specific to an application, and are not located in the ld library paths or cache. This means that they are not located directly in /usr/lib or /usr/lib64, or in a directory listed as a library path in /etc/ld.so.conf (or an /etc/ld.so.conf.d/config file). Usually, these unversioned shared objects can be found in a dedicated subdirectory under /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 (e.g. /usr/lib/purple-2/ is the plugin directory used for libpurple applications). In these cases, the unversioned shared objects do not need to be placed in a -devel package." ... right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uk6Q11mv6B&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
