Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> --- No, I'm not going to be able to drive this process, sorry. But here are my thoughts which perhaps you could present to the packaging committee, as well as things that need exploring: - In this particular package we seem to have some "regular"? desktop fonts and some web font versions of them. (I'd like to know what is different). The regular version should probably be packaged like regular fonts. The web-fonts like web-fonts. - How should we package web-fonts? Should their be a separate install locaton for them? For many web accessible items (javascript libraries) we often install an apache conf file that opens up access to their location, and then we can patch applications to point to that location. Would that work in this case? - For a package like mnmlicons-fonts, which seems more like a pure web-font, does it even make sense to follow the font packaging conventions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=POcBvu17xS&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
