Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954108
--- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #16) > A first run of "sh autogen.sh" prints the same stuff, because it also runs > the individual autotools. Those are issues that should get fixed. Especially > the "deprecated" stuff may lead to problems sometime in the future, and then > you will be unable to create the configure script. I think we may focusing on fixing such issues when it happened. "Sometime in future" when it really will lead to problems and will unable to generate configure script, is not? > There is no need to use the autogen.sh script anyway, which also executes > the "configure" script, because you should be able to run "autoreconf" > instead (or autoreconf -f). And you can use %configure appropriately, too. I sure what I may omit upstream author work and run command from autogen.sh directly from spec. But for what? I don't see any advantages to do that. Run configure script in any case is appropriate and desired as I call make then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=R8sJsx9FRP&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
