Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923460
Yanko Kaneti <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Yanko Kaneti <[email protected]> --- wrt Source: I prefer the exact opposite approach, but given you'll be the maintainer there is little point in blocking on it. Looking at the source I think the main package license should be LGPLv2+ and only the -utils GPLv2+ Some minor issues: libqmi.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.0-1 ['1.3.0-1.git20130508.fc20', '1.3.0-1.git20130508'] libqmi.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libqmi-1.3.0/README libqmi-devel.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libqmi-devel-1.3.0/ChangeLog libqmi-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Header files for adding QMI support to applications that use glib. libqmi-utils.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Utilities to use the QMI protocol from the command line. Builds in mock. Reasonably named and versioned. Does not conflict with anything existing. Please fix the license before importing. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yy65TVvrZh&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
