https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966324
--- Comment #5 from Björn Esser <[email protected]> --- > There are some files with bsd license, can you review them? to check that we > are not incurring in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > > BSD (2 clause) > -------------- > /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/codecrypt-1.1/ > src/sha2.c > /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/codecrypt-1.1/ > src/sha2.h ***** BUNDLED LIB CONFIRMED ***** This is perfectly the same as provided by sha2(-devel) !!! Make upstream aware of this and ask to add a check for a usable sha2.h / sha2-lib during configure, which only includes/links the sources-shipped sha2-files if no working sha2-lib is found. tiger.{c,h} is NOT A DUPLICATE (checked against libtiger, cryptopp, botan) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oYvF6ZTP65&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
