https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958059
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- > Version: 0.2 > Release: 20130620svn12%{?dist} Something is missing at the very left side of the Release tag here. There are naming guidelines for snapshot packages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Is this a pre-release or a post-release? At https://code.google.com/p/yum-axelget/downloads/list there is a file yum-axelget-1.0-0.3.20130617.fc18.noarch.rpm that's only four days old. > Summary: A plugin for Yum based on Axel that accelerates your > download's rate In Anaconda and package tools, which display these summaries, it looks better (and more concise) when omitting these leading articles: Summary: Download accelerator plug-in for Yum Summary: Plug-in for Yum that accelerates download speed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Examples_of_good_package_summaries Mentioning that "Axel" is being used as the backend is an unimportant detail in my opinion. It would be entirely okay to have just the %description explain that. > Requires: axel, yum-presto, yum-plugin-fastestmirror Not "yum" as a direct requirement? > %description > The following Yum plugin based on Axel speeds up your > yum downloads ... Pedantic: "... Yum downloads". One could split the description into more shorter sentences and drop tech-details, such as "opening ports" or marketing-speak, such as "dramatically speeds up your update experience". %description This is a plug-in for the Yum package tool. It speeds up your downloads using the Axel download accelerator client. > %changelog https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FrequentlyMadeMistakes (ignore the obsolete items on that page) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ubGuWJlfE0&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
