https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976468
Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcelo Barbosa from comment #1) > Hi Adam, > > I'm reviewing your package, please see this issues: > > Issues: > ======= > - gems should require rubygems package > Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-teamocil-doc > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems The -doc subpackage is requiring the main package, which requires ruby(rubygems), so this should be OK IMO. > - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. > Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/gems/gems/teamocil-0.4.4 > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles Yes, the %{gem_instdir} (without the %dir macro) should be removed. * Use %gem_install macro - Could you please use %gem_install as per latest Ruby packaging guidelines [1]. - Please note that latest gem2rpm supports this macro out of the box. You should use "-t fedora-19-rawhide" template specifier though. * Use ruby(release) instead of ruby(abi) - Latest guidelines requires you to use ruby(release) virtual provide instead of ruby(abi) [2]. Please update your .spec file appropriately. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Building_gems [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Ruby_Compatibility -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oVZDe5Dyrq&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
