https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974145
Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] Alias| |bluez5 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> --- I agree with Kalev that we should just upgrade the existing bluez package. Having 2 Conflicting (at RPM level) versions of BlueZ around is a very bad idea. (The same idea had been proposed and discarded for NetworkManager. Having different desktop environments require conflicting packages prevents installing them on the same machine, which is very broken for machines with more than one user.) KDE's BlueDevil has already been ported to BlueZ 5 in a branch: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108912/ https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/libs/libbluedevil/repository/show?rev=bluez5 https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/base/bluedevil/repository/show?rev=bluez5 Until the release (2.0?) from that branch, we can ship branch snapshots. (I'm CCing jreznik, who's done most of the BlueDevil packaging lately, but I think he'll tell you the same thing.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4Pl3cZBTRT&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
