https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984312
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Deutsch <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #7) > (In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #6) > > But is it generally fine to point to the plain-text/downloadable file hosted > > in some "rcs"? (so pointing to the raw file link at github?) > > Yes, if possible. Well, I cannot speak for other reviewers, but I like to > download both spec and srpm to a local folder and have a look at them. And > if someone wants to view the file online, a browser should also be able to > display plain text correctly. Github in particular (and probably some other > VCS web viewers) doesn't have syntax highlighting, so there's no advantage > of viewing it in the browser. Ack. So, what can I do to improve the spec? :) One thing I'll do is update it to the latest upstream and adjust the Changelog entry accordingly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aRVtzyAIYu&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
