https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985446

            Bug ID: 985446
           Summary: Review Request: gtk-vim-syntax - Vim syntax
                    highlighting for GLib, Gtk+, Xlib, Gimp, Gstreamer and
                    more
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Priority: unspecified
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
        QA Contact: [email protected]
                CC: [email protected],
                    [email protected]

Spec URL: http://amigadave.com/temp/gtk-vim-syntax.spec
SRPM URL: http://amigadave.com/temp/gtk-vim-syntax-20130716-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: A collection of C extension syntax files for xlib, glib (gobject,
gio), gdk-pixbuf, gtk2 (gdk2), gtk3 (gdk3), atk, at-spi, pango, cairo, clutter,
gimp, gstreamer, dbus-glib, json-glib, libglade, gtksourceview, gnome-desktop,
libgsf, libnotify, librsvg, libunique, libwnck, gtkglext, vte, poppler, evince. 
Fedora Account System Username: amigadave

This is my first package and review request, so I am looking for a sponsor. I
have made a scratch build of the linked SRPM in Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5618830

There are some rpmlint warnings, and I would be grateful for advice on those:

gtk-vim-syntax.spec:15: W: non-standard-group Application/Editors
gtk-vim-syntax.spec: W: no-%build-section
gtk-vim-syntax.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: gtk-vim-syntax-20130716.tar.gz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

I sent an email before packaging to ask for a release and for the example
configuration file to be updated, and the upstrem release yesterday had the
requested change.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EAtRGnw6Ea&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to