Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592670 --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-05-18 04:35:30 EDT --- > do some tests. Please, let me know if you observation [1] is a real blocker to > this package. > [6] As you may notice, there is no install section on Makefile delivered by > upstream, so I have the real need of being using %{__install} macros. IMHO, > it > would be preferable using this macros than the commands itself, wouldn' be? 1.New packagers should avoid of using unnecessarily macros, e.g. %{__rm} %{__install} %{__ln_s} etc, those macros are useless for fedora. 2. You can include examples in %doc See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks 3. As Terje RÃ said, you should list man pages in this way: %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*, because fedora may switch manpages from gz to other compression format in some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
