https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986172
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #2) > (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #1) > > [!]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file > > Note: Found : Packager: Simone Caronni <[email protected]> > > That's my local .rpmmacros. > > > [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > > file > > from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > > [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. > > Fixed in spec file; has it been reported upstream? yes @ https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/264 > > > [!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > > Provides are present. > > jackson-databind.noarch: W: self-obsoletion jackson2-databind <= 2.2.2 > > obsoletes jackson2-databind = 2.2.2 > > Can you fix this? Spec file should read: > > Obsoletes: jackson2-databind < %{version} > Provides: jackson2-databind = %{version} > done > As per: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming. > 2FReplacing_Existing_Packages > > Please fix it before importing. Package approved. thanks! Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-databind.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-databind-2.2.2-2.fc19.src.rpm New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: jackson-databind Short Description: General data-binding package for Jackson (2.x) Owners: gil Branches: f19 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xhSU1TSg3P&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
