https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658754
--- Comment #46 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- > an RPM building error "no build id note found in" for cub_cmhttpd. That ought to be explained in the spec file, at least: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo Try to find out why you get that error? Does the build run "ld" instead of gcc/g++ when linking? Then try adding --build-id to the linker flags or run the compiler instead of ld. > Which are the other 64-bit targets you are referring to? Secondary 64-bit archs, such as ppc64, AArch64. > The source may have empty files (for example some optional > configuration files). This was to remove warnings and possible > empty files from the source. In the source or in the %buildroot? What empty "optional configuration files" get installed into the %buildroot only to delete them afterwards? It would be safer to delete them explicitly. > if you have any suggestion to avoid name conflicts, please let us know. On rather simple way is to put headers into a subdirectory of %includedir. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lrI52hvNMw&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
