https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #45 from Peter Robinson <[email protected]> --- > The source is being licensed under the GPLv2 (and upstream is pretty > religious about including the right text in all of the source files). > > Is it necessary to include a copy of GPLv2? I can, but it seems redundant. Amusingly "licensecheck --recursive" doesn't properly pick up the GPLv2 license header in any of the source files. So while all appear to be GPLv2 there's some in generate/unix/iasl/obj/ that are GPLv3+ so it's possible that at least some binaries are licensed differently. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix I can't find explicitly where it says we need to include a licence/copying file but in the subpackaging it states the details of it. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Jme6cha3sQ&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
