https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991639
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- So, "fedora-review -b 991639" completes and doesn't complain about anything. Let's see what else there is: [...] Differences between python3-facct and python-facct. * The Python2 build specifies "Group: Development/Libraries", whereas the Python3 build sets "Group: Applications/Productivity". * The Python2 requires texlive-latex and ghostscript, the Python3 build doesn't. Those are no blockers, but worth fixing later prior to a first release at Fedora. As for the run-time, I'm not sure, do you want this to be more of a Python module/framework or a set of command-line tools? Or both at once? The README.txt examples call scripts via "python …" and relative paths, which isn't convenient and would only work when entering the top-level Python facct module dir. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0pek4v1YMk&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
